MO: Bandana covering lower half of face in high crime area is reasonable suspicion

“Here, Officer Lane testified that when he passed the vehicle at approximately 11:40 P.M., he observed a rear passenger with a bandana covering the lower half of his face. The parking lot was in a high-crime area. Officer Lane thought the face covering at that time and place was ‘odd’ and ‘suspicious,’ and he wanted to investigate further. We agree with the trial court that wearing a bandana or cloth over one’s face is indicative that the person is trying to disguise himself, which should cause a reasonable police officer to conclude in light of his experience that criminal activity ‘may be afoot.’” State v. Spires, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1265 (November 12, 2014).

Defendant failed in his burden of showing standing before the USMJ, but the court’s concerned enough about alleged factual disputes that it will let him reopen the record to put on more. United States v. Howell, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159112 (E.D. Wis. November 12, 2014),* R&R 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159113 (E.D. Wis. March 6, 2014).*

During a traffic stop for no taillights, obvious on the dashcam video, the officer saw marijuana flakes on the driver’s shirt. That was at least reasonable suspicion. United States v. Johnson, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159521 (D. Minn. September 11, 2014), R&R 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 159729 (D. Minn. November 12, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.