TX: Court of appeals erred in not considering GFE on a Fourth Amendment violation

The affidavit for the warrant failed to provide probable cause for the search, but the court of appeals erred in not attempting to apply the good faith exception. The case is remanded for that. McClintock v. State, 2014 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1466 (October 1, 2014):

Having concluded that a Fourth Amendment violation occurred in this cause, the First Court of Appeals held that the trial court should have granted the appellant’s motion to suppress. The State now contends that the court of appeals should not have reversed the appellant’s conviction without first deciding whether the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applied. We granted the State’s petition for discretionary review in order to examine whether the court of appeals erred in that respect and also to determine whether the court of appeals erred in one of the questions it did decide, namely, whether after excluding (what it found to be) illegally obtained information from the search-warrant affidavit, the remaining information still served to supply probable cause to search. Concluding that the court of appeals did not err to hold that the balance of the warrant affidavit failed to provide probable cause, we will vacate the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the cause to that court to address the good-faith issue in the first instance.

This entry was posted in Good faith exception. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.