OH9: Excessive nervousness and sweating when asked about gun was RS

When defendant was asked about whether he was armed, he became excessively nervous and started sweating. This was reasonable suspicion to the officer. During the patdown, the rock of crack was immediately apparent to the officer. State v. Mathis, 2014-Ohio-3803, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 3727 (9th Dist. September 3, 2014).

Yes, this affidavit for a search warrant could have been more detailed, but it still provides probable cause on the totality. United States v. Bergen, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 122543 (M.D. Fla. September 3, 2014), adopting United States v. Bergen, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124610 (M.D. Fla., May 20, 2014)*:

Likewise, the deficiencies Defendant points out in the affidavit are not fatal to the sufficiency of the affidavit to establish probable cause to search Defendant’s residence. While Det. Hicks might have described in greater detail such facts as: (1) the days that he surveilled the residence, (2) the time of day on the dates he surveilled the residence, (3) the identity of the occupants of the cars visiting Defendant’s residence, (4) how many times he surveilled the residence, etc., the fact that he did not do so does not render the affidavit insufficient. Although the affidavit at bar may not be a paradigm, it was nevertheless sufficient to establish probable cause.

This entry was posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.