M.D.Pa.: Throwing a bag over a fence to hide it from the police was not an abandonment

Throwing a bag over a fence to hide it from the police was not an abandonment. United States v. Curran, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 68634 (M.D. Pa. May 19, 2014):

Although Defendant obviously endeavored to hide the bags from police, his actions do not manifest clear and unequivocal evidence of intent to abandon the bags. This case is unlike other abandonment cases in which the defendant drops a bag in a location and leaves the vicinity, or claims the item does not belong to him/her. See, e.g., Abel v. United States, 362 U.S. 217, 241, 80 S. Ct. 683, 4 L. Ed. 2d 668 (1960) (items found in trash can of hotel room had been abandoned by the defendant); Thomas, 864 F.2d at 846 (defendant abandoned gym bag by leaving it on the second floor of an apartment building and then leaving the premises); United States v. Fulani, 368 F.3d 351, 354 (3d Cir. 2004) (defendant abandoned bag by claiming that it did not belong to him); United States v. Perkins, 871 F. Supp. 801 (M.D. Pa. 1995) (defendant abandoned bag by leaving it on a bus and failing to return to claim it). Regardless of Defendant’s purported reason for tossing the bags over the fence, it is clear that he planned to retrieve the bags and take them to his vehicle, but was apprehended by the police in the process. Thus, the bags were not abandoned.

This entry was posted in Abandonment. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.