S.D.Ind.: There is no standing to challenge GPS placement on a car in which one is a passenger [I disagree]

There is no standing to challenge GPS placement on a car in which one is a passenger. [I beg to disagree because the passenger is being tracked, too. What’s the difference between this and Brendlin where the stop of a car was a stop of the passenger? If the passenger is stopped, the passenger is also followed.] United States v. Allen, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47588 (S.D. Ind. April 7, 2014).

“[U]nder the facts presented by this case, a forensic computer search cannot be performed under the border search doctrine in the absence of reasonable suspicion. Because the officials here reasonably suspected that Saboonchi was violating export restrictions, Defendant’s Motion to Suppress is denied.” United States v. Saboonchi, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47665 (D. Md. April 7, 2014).

There’s no reasonable expectation of privacy in an apartment building’s common basement storage area. Defendant also consented to a patdown. United States v. Ellis, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47666 (D. Minn. April 7, 2014),* R&R 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48286 (D. Minn. March 17, 2014).*