WA: Defense counsel was ineffective for waiving a valid suppression motion

Defense counsel was ineffective for not pursuing a valid suppression motion that was held waived on appeal. State v. Hamilton, __ Wn. App. __, 320 P.3d 142 (2014).

A “quick patdown” while juveniles were standing next to a police car wouldn’t make a reasonable juvenile think he was in custody, and his production of marijuana on request was not suppressed. “Based on the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that a reasonable sixteen-year-old would not have believed he was under restraint to the degree associated with a formal arrest at the time the officer asked him whether he had any drugs. Consequently, the trial court did not err by denying J.T.M.’s motion to suppress the first statement or the marihuana seized from his pocket.” [Yeah, right. The officer frisked him first. What’s he supposed to think?] In re J.T.M., 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 2910 (Tex. App. – El Paso March 12, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.