WA: Officer’s mistake on called-in LPN voided stop

Defendant’s stop was based on a mistake as to the LPN he called in which came back stolen. Therefore, the stop was unjustified, and the plain view of drugs in the backseat couldn’t be sustained. The officer’s mistake of fact here couldn’t be “reasonable.” State v. Creed, 2014 Wash. App. LEXIS 388 (February 20, 2014).

Defendant wasn’t entitled to the name of the CI in his prosecution for possession after a search warrant was executed because the controlled buy from the house wasn’t the basis of the prosecution. However, the officer could testify that others apparently had access to the house for that purpose. In addition, defense counsel was not ineffective for not raising the issue of who was responsible for the controlled buy because it would have opened the door to other potential buys coming out, and that was a valid strategic choice. King v. State, 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 74 (February 21, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.