CA2: Bailey on remand: Terry violated, but harmless

The Second Circuit on remand of Bailey v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 1031 (2013), finds admission of the illegally seized evidence harmless. United States v. Bailey, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3320 (2d Cir. February 21, 2014):

After further briefing and oral argument, this court now concludes that Terry v. Ohio independently supported Bailey’s initial detention and patdown, but that his subsequent handcuffing exceeded the scope of a reasonable Terry stop in the circumstances of this case. Accordingly, while evidence obtained from Bailey before handcuffing—inculpatory statements, a driver’s license, and a set of keys—was lawfully obtained and admissible at trial, exculpatory statements made by Bailey after handcuffing were not. We nevertheless conclude that no vacatur for retrial is required because admission of the tainted statements was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.