S.D.Ga.: No seatbelt justified stop; drug dog readily at hand

Defendant’s traffic stop was justified by not having on a seatbelt, and a drug dog alerted. His one witness was his admittedly biased girlfriend whose testimony was contradicted by the officers. Credibility goes with the officers. United States v. Enmund, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15081 (S.D. Ga. January 6, 2014),* adopted 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14992 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 6, 2014).*

The plain view issue turns on whether the court believes the officer that defendant’s girlfriend opened a nightstand drawer making for the plain view or the officer opened it. Based on an analysis of the credibility factors, the court goes with the officer. United States v. Gonzalez, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15103 (E.D. Pa. January 30, 2014).*

The district court properly decided against plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment § 1983 claim, but it’s not going to tell us what it was. Humphries v. Chicarelli, 554 Fed. Appx. 401 (6th Cir. 2014).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.