D.Vt.: Touching line not improper lane usage

Defendant’s stop for maintaining his lane was improper, but his giving a false name when stopped was an independent crime. After things went South and he was arrested, he agreed to cooperate with the police, and his cell phone search was by consent. United States v. Williams, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12951 (D. Vt. February 3, 2014). On the lane usage:

Accordingly, the court finds that, under Vermont law, momentarily touching a passing lane demarcation with no risk to public safety does not give rise to a failure to “remain entirely” in a single lane “as nearly as practicable.” 23 V.S.A. § 1038. A contrary interpretation would authorize random stops, penalizes routine operation, and “lead to absurd or irrational results.” Tuma, 2013 VT 70, * 8, (internal quotation marks omitted). Because Trooper Studin’s stop of the motor vehicle in which Defendant was travelling was unlawful, Defendant was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.