M.D.Ala.: Def passenger’s denial of possession of gun seized from car means no standing

Defendant was a passenger in a car stopped and searched and a gun came from the console. Defendant disavowed any connection to the gun in the motion to suppress, so he has no standing to challenge the gun. The owner’s denial of consent does not create any additional legally cognizable expectation of privacy. United States v. Smith, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 183466 (M.D. Ala. December 18, 2013):

He argues that the fact that the owner of the vehicle, Rosie Murphy, declined to give her consent to search led to a legitimate expectation on his part that the officers would not search the vehicle. This argument is admirable for its creativity, but nevertheless unavailing. Murphy’s failure to consent did not convey to Smith any possessory interest in the car. If anything, her assertion of control by declining consent only reemphasized Smith’s own lack of authority over the vehicle.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.