CA8: 20-25 minute protective sweep was not unreasonable

Officers responded to a break-in report at defendant’s house reported by a neighbor. They could see people inside, and the neighbor reported a shot fired. Defendant arrived, and the police said they were going in whether he consented or not. He at first denied living there. Inside they did a protective sweep for possible shooters and victims, and they saw a gun in plain view and a diaper box full of baggies of marijuana. The protective sweep took 20-25 minutes, and the court rejects the argument that it was too intense or too long. United States v. Goodrich, 739 F.3d 1091 (8th Cir. 2014).*

The search warrants were issued on probable cause. The three hour delay between defendant’s arrest and the issuance of the search warrant for his property is not an issue. He cites no authority that this makes it unlawful. United States v. Bigbee, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 694 (M.D. Tenn. January 3, 2014).*

CI was corroborated by two controlled buys. United States v. Cunningham, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2988 (N.D. Ohio January 10, 2014).* [Note: Why do we even see this anymore?]

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.