NE: Jardines doesn’t prevent an officer from coming to the door to make an arrest

Jardines involved a drug dog sniffing on the porch at the door, and it doesn’t prevent an officer from coming to the door to arrest the defendant on a warrant. Defendant actually accompanied the officers off the porch to the sidewalk first. State v. Warrack, 21 Neb. App. 604, 842 N.W.2d 167 (2014).

There was probable cause for the search warrant of defendants’ house based on evidence from a trash search and other things. [Described almost as a slam dunk issue. “They argue that these papers depict only legal transactions. But the defendants are viewing this evidence through rose-colored glasses. Fairly read, it tied the defendants’ home tightly to” the fraud.] United States v. Floyd, 740 F.3d 22, 2014-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P50,124 (1st Cir. 2014).*

Defendant was in a warehouse searched, but he couldn’t show any standing to contest the search. The officers first sought consent, then believed the consenter (who just worked there) might lack authority so they got a search warrant. State v. Rodelo, 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 31 (January 7, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.