DOJ Surveillance Law Memo Can Remain Secret, Court Says

BLT: DOJ Surveillance Law Memo Can Remain Secret, Court Says:

The U.S. Department of Justice can keep secret a legal memo that addresses the authority and legality of the FBI’s ability to acquire phone records without legal process, a federal appeals court in Washington ruled today.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, including one of the court’s newest members, Sri Srinivasan, said the “deliberative process” legal privilege shields the document from public scrutiny. Read the opinion here.

NYT: Court Grants Secrecy for Memo on Phone Data by Charlie Savage.

Electronic Frontier Foundation v. U.S. Department of Justice, 12-5363 (January 3, 2014):

On the record before us, we hold that the OLC Opinion, which was requested by the FBI in response to the OIG’s investigation into its information-gathering techniques, is an “advisory opinion[], recommendation[] and deliberation[] comprising part of a process by which governmental decisions and policies are formulated,” and is therefore covered by the deliberative process privilege. Klamath Water Users, 532 U.S. at 8 (quotation omitted). We also hold that the FBI did not “adopt” the OLC Opinion and thereby waive the deliberative process privilege. The OIG mentioned the OLC Opinion in its report, and a congressional committee inquired about the OLC Opinion, but the FBI never itself adopted the OLC Opinion’s reasoning as its own. Finally, because the entire OLC Opinion is exempt from disclosure under the deliberative process privilege, we need not decide whether particular sections were properly withheld as classified, or whether some material is reasonably segregable from the material properly withheld.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.