W.D.N.Y.: Of course defendant consented because he even signed a police form: “I have not been threatened, nor forced in any way.”

Defendant was arrested after eight officers entered his business with guns drawn. After he was handcuffed, the guns were holstered, and he was asked for consent. The consent was voluntary. In fact, he signed a form saying that he wasn’t coerced: “No evidence exists that the agents pressured Sinclair to execute the form through promises, threats or other coercive means. Indeed, the form that Sinclair signed contained the printed statement, “‘I have not been threatened, nor forced in any way.’” United States v. Sinclair, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167475 (W.D. N.Y. May 10, 2013), adopted 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166622 (W.D.N.Y., Nov. 22, 2013).*

While the language of the affidavit was intended to enhance the eyewitness identification related in it, the court doesn’t find that it amounts to a Franks violation. “While I agree that the language quoted above from the affidavit could have been articulated more clearly with respect to the four eyewitness identifications and the language appears deliberately chosen by affiants to strengthen the identification, in and of itself the language is not so misleading as to call the probable cause determination into question.” United States v. Jackson, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 167892 (M.D. Fla. October 18, 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.