D.Vt.: When female suspect consented to a search of her person, it was reasonable to wait for a female officer to do it

Officers had a search warrant for a vehicle and an occupant, and defendant was there too. They developed enough information to detain her as well, and she consented to a search of her person, but officers elected to have a female officer do that, and they waited a reasonable time for one to show up. In the meantime, she incriminated herself. United States v. Baptiste, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95755 (D. Vt. August 25, 2011).*

Defendant was driving through a supermarket parking lot with his lights off and stopped for two minutes, and the driver and passenger switched. This was suspicious enough that criminal activity was afoot to make a stop. When the officer questioned the former passenger now driver, he found that her license was suspended, and that justified a longer detention. State v. Little, 2011 Ohio 4175, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 3482 (12th Dist. August 22, 2011).*

In a valid traffic stop, the officer smelled intoxicants, but rejected the driver as the source. He moved to the passenger who admitted to having an open container, and that gave probable cause to search for the open container. The defendant was told to “come clean,” and he admitted to marijuana possession as well, and that was further probable cause. Harper v. State, 349 S.W.3d 188 (Tex. App. — Amarillo 2011).*

Defendant’s motion to suppress raised a knock-and-announce issue that was not fully decided by the trial court. Remanded for findings. State v. Dillon, 163 Wn. App. 101, 257 P.3d 678 (2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.