WI: Social media TOS agreements show no REP in CP

The Terms of Service agreements of social media platforms state that they are required by law to report child pornography. Therefore, there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in one’s files that are child pornography. State v. Gasper, 2024 Wisc. App. LEXIS 914 (Oct. 30, 2024):

P19 The Sexual Content Explainer restates Snapchat’s prohibition on any content or activity related to the sexual exploitation of a child. It also has a paragraph describing how it scans user accounts and reports child pornography to NCMEC, just as it did in this case:

Preventing, detecting, and eradicating Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) on our platform is a top priority for us, and we continuously evolve our capabilities to address CSAM and other types of child sexually exploitative content. We report violations of these policies to [NCMEC], as required by law. NCMEC then, in turn, coordinates with domestic or international law enforcement, as required.

P20 Gasper has failed to satisfy his burden to prove either his subjective or an objective expectation of privacy. First, as to any subjective expectation of privacy, Gasper did not testify, nor did he submit any admissible evidence to meet his burden to show that he believed the video downloaded on Snapchat was private. Other than Schroeder’s affidavit that established Gasper’s Wi-Fi was password protected, there is no factual basis to conclude that Gasper had a subjective expectation of privacy in the video.

This entry was posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Social media warrants. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.