CA6: GPS tracking warrant litigated in state court couldn’t be habeas issue

Defendant’s habeas claim that the application for the GPS tracking warrant was based on false information was barred by Stone v. Powell. Neil v. Forshey, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 34461 (6th Cir. Oct. 30, 2020).*

Defendant’s successive habeas petition raises the same Fourth Amendment claim that has already been rejected, and this is too and must be dismissed. In re Hammond, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 34540 (11th Cir. Nov. 3, 2020).*

This entry was posted in Issue preclusion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.