N.D.Ga.: Seizure of a computer under a warrant authorizes its search, even after the 14 day window

Seizure of a computer under a warrant authorizes its search, even after the 14 day window in the warrant. Phone conversations between defendant and his lawyer over the jail phone system were not subject to attorney-client privilege because there was a warning playing on the phone during the call that calls were recorded. United States v. Ilonzo, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 135895 (N.D.Ga. October 6, 2015), R&R 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 136783 (N.D.Ga. May 18, 2015).

Defendant had no standing in a friend’s apartment. He often visited there, pretty much whenever he felt like it, knew the occupants all his life, but he never spent the night there. United States v. Howard, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138316 (W.D.Tenn. Aug. 19, 2015),* adopted 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 137491 (W.D.Tenn. Oct. 8, 2015).*

State’s forfeiture action was void because there was no state jurisdiction over the money. The feds had it. Ruiz v. City of Montgomery, 2015 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 235 (Oct. 9, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Computer and cloud searches, Forfeiture, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.