VI: Arrest for possession of an unlicensed firearm required knowledge that the defendant had no license, not just that he possessed a firearm

Defendant’s arrest for possession of an unlicensed firearm in the Territory required knowledge that the defendant had no license, not just that he possessed a firearm. Motion to suppress granted. People v. Pryce, 2015 V.I. LEXIS 91 (Super.Ct. July 27, 2015).

The search of defendant’s cell phone was a year and a half before Riley, but Riley applies because the case is still pending. The government relied on consent, but the court finds that it did not sustain its burden. People v. Colon, 2015 V.I. LEXIS 94 (Super.Ct. August 5, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Cell phones, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.