TX13: Fleeing from the police and crashing is not a “stop”

Defendant challenged his stop as unlawful, but he slowed for a second and then fled at high speed until he crashed and then he was arrested. There was no stop–he fled. Gonzalez v. State, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 8934 (Tex. App. – Corpus Christi – Edinburg August 14, 2014).

Defendant’s McNeely claim against the Tennessee implied consent statute wasn’t preserved in the trial court, so it’s waived it. State v. Chrystak, 2014 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 787 (August 13, 2014).*

Defendant challenged his conviction for evading arrest without specifically challenging the arrest pretrial. Therefore, it’s deemed waived. State v. Smith, 2014 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 794 (August 13, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.