IN: Seizure of clothes from professed crime victim was reasonable; turned out he was the suspect

When defendant’s clothes were seized by the police at the hospital, it was because he said he was a crime victim. When the police figured out he was lying and he was the shooter, they got a search warrant to inspect the clothes that had been seized, and the victim’s DNA was on them. Tuggle v. State, 2014 Ind. App. LEXIS 220 (May 22, 2014).

Defendant’s stop was justified by witnesses to a traffic accident saying she was involved. That’s an articulable basis. Wing v. State, 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 339 (May 27, 2014).*

Officers were working a train station in Rutland, Vermont before the last stop of the NYC and Philadelphia trains looking for drug couriers. Defendant fit the profile and was picked up. She was followed to the house where they were going, and engaged her in conversation. It was arguably a detention and not consensual, but it was with reasonable suspicion on the totality, and her admission she had heroin and the consent search were valid. United States v. Allen, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73146 (D. Vt. May 29, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Emergency / exigency, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.