Daily Archives: March 21, 2019

Cal. App. Div.: Driver being told he had to submit to a BAC test wasn’t consent at all

The officer here told defendant that he had to submit to a blood test, so there was no voluntary consent. “Here, the officer violated section 655.1 by telling defendant he had to choose instead of requesting that he submit to … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on Cal. App. Div.: Driver being told he had to submit to a BAC test wasn’t consent at all

IN: An electronic signature on an e-warrant satisfies the oath or affirmation requirement

The officer’s electronic signature on an electronic search warrant application satisfies the search warrant statute and the oath and affirmation requirement. Abd v. State, 2019 Ind. App. LEXIS 125 (Mar. 19, 2019):

Posted in Warrant requirement | Comments Off on IN: An electronic signature on an e-warrant satisfies the oath or affirmation requirement

NC: The state bears the burden of proof of reasonableness under Grady and it failed here

NC recognizes that its case law is in vast disarray since Grady v. North Carolina, and it’s tough to sort out. The state bears the burden of proof on reasonableness of satellite based monitoring of a sex offender. Here, the … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data | Comments Off on NC: The state bears the burden of proof of reasonableness under Grady and it failed here

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: Fourth Circuit Deepens the Split on Accessing Opened E-Mails

Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: Fourth Circuit Deepens the Split on Accessing Opened E-Mails by Orin Kerr Courts have been struggling with this issue for years, and now the law is even more divided than before.

Posted in E-mail | Comments Off on Reason: Volokh Conspiracy: Fourth Circuit Deepens the Split on Accessing Opened E-Mails