WaPo: Wonkbook: These programs might well have been legal. That’s almost worse

WaPo: Wonkbook: These programs might well have been legal. That’s almost worse by Ezra Klein and Evan Soltas:

“Rather than dismantling Mr. Bush’s approach to national security,” Peter Baker writes in today’s New York Times, “Mr. Obama has to some extent validated it and put it on a more sustainable footing.”

The fog surrounding the United States’s national-security apparatus has lifted a little over the last forty-eight hours. Reports from Glenn Greenwald in The Guardian and Barton Gellman and Laura Poitras in The Washington Post sketch the outlines of a surveillance program that is large, indiscriminate, and unaccountable that everything from Americans’ phone records to the contents of their personal emails lie at the fingertips of federal officials — officials, no less, whose powers have been granted in special courts that disclose neither their decisions nor their legal justifications.

. . .

The administration’s response is that the program is legal and is overseen by both Congress and the courts. They also gesture towards, but don’t really identify, “numerous inaccuracies” in the reports.

If the reports of how these programs work are wrong then the reports are wrong. But if not, it’s true that these programs might well be legal under existing law. They might well have been subject to congressional oversight. That’s even scarier.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.