OH8: Inventory policy didn’t address closed containers, so they couldn’t be opened to be inventoried

A general inventory policy that the contents of vehicles be inventoried but that does not specify that closed containers be inventoried does not permit specifically opening the closed containers. One officer testified to “inventorying thousands of vehicles” and always interpreting it that way. State v. Hullum, 2013 Ohio 1448, 2013 Ohio App. LEXIS 1360 (8th Dist. April 11, 2013):

[*P28] Sergeant Mitchell did testify that he believed the policy required him to search all closed containers within a vehicle that is being impounded. He further stated that after inventorying thousands of vehicles, that is how he has always interpreted the policy. Officer Cushman testified that is what she believed the policy required as well, although she admitted that she did not read the provision at issue.

[*P29] Despite the officers’ testimonies, however, the inventory search conducted by Sergeant Mitchell was not done under the specific guidelines of a written policy that permits the opening of a closed container within a vehicle. The East Cleveland Police Department has a reasonable policy and procedure in place governing inventory searches in general, but that policy is insufficient to justify the opening of a closed container found during an inventory search. See Hathman at 408. “Rather, some articulated policy must also exist which regulates the opening of containers found during the authorized inventory search.”

Back to blog

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.