CA6: Hot pursuit entry of home invasion robber’s place was reasonable

Defendant was known by his victims, and he committed a home invasion robbery where he threatened to kill his victims if they called police. When they quickly found him, a warrantless entry was justified. United States v. Daws, 711 F.3d 725 (6th Cir. 2013):

All things considered, the situation presented a “potential for injury to the officers or others and the need for swift action.” United States v. Huffman, 461 F.3d 777, 785 (6th Cir. 2006). The necessary delay associated with the alternative – getting a warrant – would have heightened the risk that Daws would act on the threats or make a run for it. The Fourth Amendment does not require police to ignore the real risk of a shootout or of a suspect’s escaping and making good on death threats.

Back to blog

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.