E.D.Ky.: Emergency aid exception permitted entry into house where victim left at hospital was tortured

A beating and torture victim was left at a hospital ER. As best as the police could determine, there were others in the house where this happened, so they went back without lights and siren and entered the house for a protective sweep. Under the emergency aid exception, this was a reasonable entry. On the totality, swift action was required, and that made the entry reasonable. United States v. Shephard, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45287 (E.D. Ky. March 29, 2013):

However, the Court agrees that the focus of the Huffman court’s analysis was the potential for injury to the officers or others and the need for swift action. Both of these benchmarks exist in this case, because the officers were told directly by the victim that a woman and child were with him during the violent break-in when a known victim was bound and tortured, and because of the admitted uncertainty regarding whether additional suspects or victims would be within the home. Looking to the totality of the circumstances, and viewing the necessities of the situation at the time, the Court finds that the officers reasonably believed that the woman and child were in the home, thus justifying the entry and two-minute sweep of the home. The objective circumstances justified a warrantless entry under the risk-of-danger exception, as announced by Stuart and explained by Huffman. 547 U.S. 398; 461 F.3d 777.

Back to blog

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.