D.Vt.: Inmate accepting furlough subject to search

Defendant accepted state furlough: “Lamell’s choice was between remaining in his cell or going on furlough. Under such circumstances, this Court cannot conclude that acceptance of certain terms of release rendered his assent involuntary.” Therefore, he was subject to search on furlough. United States v. Lamell, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153424 (D. Vt. October 25, 2012).*

Defendant’s stop for turning too wide and going outside the lane was justified. State v. Petty, 2012 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 866 (October 11, 2012).*

No jurisdiction to enjoin TSA’s alleged Fourth Amendment violations. Haka v. United States, 107 Fed. Cl. 111 (2012).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.