AK: Suspicious behavior alone not enough to be probable cause

Suspicious behavior alone is not enough to establish probable cause where none otherwise exists. Ruaro v. State, 280 P.3d 1233 (Alas. App. 2012). (From the concurring opinion: “As described by Trooper Brown when he applied for the search warrant, Leon Ruaro received an unusual series of packages over a period of months, all shipped to him in Ketchikan via Alaska Marine Lines. On a couple of occasions, Ruaro became incensed and abusive when the Marine Lines failed to promptly off-load a package from its barge, so that Ruaro could pick it up.” Who gets cocaine by barge? Alaskans apparently do. Drug dogs sniff packages by air, but not by barge.)

Aside from the CI’s basis for a stop, the officer recognized defendant as a person with a suspended DL, and that justified the stop. Pretext was thus irrelevant. United States v. Irons, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103708 (N.D. W.Va. July 26, 2012).*

Defendant’s racial profiling IAC claim on his 2255 was barred by the result of his suppression hearing and the Third Circuit affirming on appeal. United States v. Edwards, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104191 (E.D. Pa. July 26, 2012).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.