LA5: Pretextual stop had factual basis so it was lawful

Admitted pretextual stop had a factual basis, so it was legal. State v. Martin, 83 So. 3d 230 (La. App. 5 Cir. 2011):

In the instant case, the officer was justified in stopping defendant’s vehicle. Officer Mekdessie observed that defendant violated a traffic law in that he had a broken taillight on his vehicle. The Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office Arrest Report and Probable Cause Affidavit contained in the record show that defendant was charged with having improper equipment in violation of LSA-R.S. 32:53, which requires that a vehicle contain parts in proper condition.

Moreover, there was no evidence that this stop was a pretext to investigate the commission of other crimes. However, even if it was, this Court indicated in Davis [31 So.3d 513], that police officers may make an initial traffic stop after observing a traffic infraction, even if the stop is a pretext to investigate for other crimes. Also, the fact that the officer did not issue a citation for the traffic offense is not relevant to the constitutionality of the stop.

A motion to suppress is to raise Fourth Amendment violations before trial. It is not to be used in place of a motion in limine of evidence to be excluded. People v. Burney, 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 1295, 2011 IL App (4th) 100343 (December 27, 2011),* modified on denial of rehearing January 26, 2012.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.