CA3: Second protective sweep was justified by noise inside

The premises had been subjected to a protective sweep seeing firearms, locked up, and a search warrant was sought. Officers heard a noise inside and came in and found defendant and he’d apparently moved one of the guns. The initial entry for the protective sweep was justified by the circumstances. The reentry for defendant’s moving around was, too. United States v. Pope, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 4625 (3d Cir. Feb. 17, 2026).

Driving with one low beam light out was reasonable suspicion for a stop. Cairo v. State, 2026 Md. App. LEXIS 185 (Feb. 13, 2026) (unpublished).*

This search warrant was executed to establish whether an uncommunicative registered sex offender lived there. State v. Uranga, 2026 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 20 (Feb. 13, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.