MA: Report of threatening man with a gun and consent to entry permitted officers to lift a pillow off his covered hand when he did not respond to them

Police responded to a call of a man with a gun in an apartment threatening to kill somebody. They were admitted into the apartment by the caller, and they found the man in the back room with a pillow over his hand. Removal of the pillow revealing a gun was reasonable under the circumstances. There was plenty of reason to believe there was a gun under the pillow. Commonwealth v. Samuel, 80 Mass. App. Ct. 560, 954 N.E.2d 557 (2011).*

The officer approached defendant he already knew from prior encounters to talk to him about a bank robbery. He had no reasonable suspicion, and, if the defendant “blew him off” and walked away, he would have done nothing about it, but if he ran he’d chase. Defendant consented to a search of his pockets for officer safety. State v. Hall, 2011 Ohio 5096, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 4211 (5th Dist. September 26, 2011).*

In an intrusion on seclusion invasion of privacy civil case, procuring admission to plaintiffs’ house under false pretenses was not a cognizable tort. Looking to Fourth Amendment cases where a police officer feigns another purpose to get entry where the consent to enter was not exceeded, this was not a tort. Burnette v. Porter, 2011 Tenn. App. LEXIS 533 (September 30, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.