FL5: The Florida loud music statute violates free speech, but the search that ensued was not suppressed because the officer was not on notice it was unconstitutional

Defendant was stopped for a loud music complaint, and that led to his being stopped, and then his DL was found to be suspended. That led to a search of the car and that produced cocaine. The loud music statute was unconstitutional as an abridgement of free speech. However, that did not lead to the search being invalid because the officer was not on notice that the statute was unconstitutional. Montgomery v. State, 69 So. 3d 1023 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011).

A woman knocked on a door in an apartment complex in a bathroom saying she had been raped, and her clothing was ripped off in defendant’s apartment. The police were called and went to defendant’s apartment, and a woman answered the door who consented to entry and the officer found the dress ripped as the robed woman described. The entry was legal. Kohn v. State, 69 So. 3d 388, 36 Fla. L. Weekly D 2057 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).*

The state failed to prove constructive possession, yet defendant did not argue that the search condition that the police used was not valid. Ford v. State, 69 So. 3d 391 n.3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011)*:

The record shows that warrantless searches were not a condition of Mr. Ford’s community control. Submission to warrantless search is a special condition that must be specified on the order. § 948.03, Fla. Stat. (2009). On Mr. Ford’s community control order, there is no check mark in special conditions box 20, “You shall submit your person, property, place of residence, vehicle or personal effects to a warrantless search at any time, by any probation or community control officer or any law enforcement officer.” Mr. Ford argued at the hearing that Ms. Davis’s consent was not voluntary, and thus the search was illegal, because the officers told her that they had legal authority to search without consent. See Bumper v. N.C., 391 U.S. 543, 548-50, 88 S. Ct. 1788, 20 L. Ed. 2d 797 (1968); Luna-Martinez v. State, 984 So. 2d 592, 598 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). Mr. Ford did not raise the legality of the search on appeal.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.