M.D.Tenn.: Officer’s abrupt u-turn when he passed defendant and stop was a seizure without reasonable suspicion

The officer’s abrupt u-turn when he saw defendant turn away as he passed and pulling up next to the defendant and calling for backup was a seizure without reasonable suspicion. The officer admitted during questioning that the defendant was not free to leave. United States v. Whitson, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 106654 (M.D. Tenn. September 20, 2011)*:

The Court concludes that Terry, Brown and Williams control here. First, under Terry, the “manner” of Jayne’s approach to the Defendant is a significant element of Terry. 392 U.S. at 22. Here, the circumstances of the stop here are that when the Defendant turned away from him, Jayne made an abrupt u-turn and pulled his police vehicle “close to” the Defendant who was on a public sidewalk. The other key facts are, based upon Jayne’s testimony that his vehicle was readily identifiable as a police vehicle and Jayne called other officers, one of whom arrived within a minute. These facts establish a Terry stop at a point when Jayne lacked any reasonable suspicion.

Defendant consented to seizure and search of his computers for child pornography. [Since I’ve had two just like this where the defendant “acknowledged he had a problem,” I quote part of the court’s conclusion.] United States v. Emanuel, 440 Fed. Appx. 881 (11th Cir. 2011) (unpublished)*:

Accepting the magistrate’s findings that the officers, and not Emanuel, testified credibly, the interview occurred in Emanuel’s home, Emanuel was not prevented from leaving, and Emanuel did not ask to leave or ask the officers to leave. Emanuel invited the officers inside and cooperatively responded to their questions and requests. Emanuel was not threatened, coerced, restrained, handcuffed, patted down, required to answer questions, physically intimidated, or promised leniency. Although the officers were armed, they never removed their weapons from the holsters. The overall tone of the interview was “cordial,” “conversational,” and “very laid back.” Even though Emanuel exhibited signs of anxiety, he complied with the officers’ request for consent to release the computer by composing his own consent statement. Emanuel acknowledged that he had a problem, verbally asked for help, and reiterated in his consent statement that he was asking for help by releasing the computer.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.