D.Colo.: Narrow subpoena for potential impeaching evidence in seizing officer’s personnel file upheld

The right to compulsory production of the searching officer’s personnel file that was specific only for potential impeachment material would be enforced under United States v. Nixon, Rule 17(c), and Colorado’s privacy standards (People v. Spykstra, 234 P.3d 662, 670 (Colo. 2010)). United States v. Neal, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92151 (D. Colo. August 18, 2011):

Though Defendant does not refer to specific documents from the Officers’ personnel files, his request is limited to the topics of “work history and training, complaints against the individual officers, disciplinary actions, both pending and already adjudicated, notes, records and reports, commendations.” … This shows that Defendant has attempted to limit the evidence sought to be produced to those subjects most likely to yield impeachment material. Without having seen the personnel files, the Court cannot imagine how Defendant could be more specific.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.