M.D.Ala.: RS of drug dealing justification for frisk of person and car because guns likely present

Defendant’s stop was for a traffic violation and with reasonable suspicion he was involved in drug dealing. His frisk and vehicle frisk was justified by the drug dealing RS alone. United States v. Jones, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 82741 (M.D. Ala. June 29, 2011)*:

Here, when Stacey conducted the patdown, he believed that the driver of the vehicle was en route to purchase narcotics with a large quantity of cash. He also believed that Jones had taken an extended time to stop his vehicle and that he appeared to be nervous. Prior cases have recognized that “‘investigative detentions involving suspects in vehicles are especially fraught with danger to police officers,’” noting the “inordinate risk confronting an officer as he approaches a person seated in an automobile.” Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032, 1047-1048 (1983) (citation omitted). In addition, individuals involved in narcotics trafficking are often armed. United States v. Cruz, 909 F.2d 422, 424 (11 Cir. 1989); …

The CI’s believable information dealt with past, recent, and likely current possession of drugs in defendant’s house, so the warrant was not stale. State v. Marsing, 244 Ore. App. 556, 260 P.3d 739 (2011).*

The findings of consent are supported by the record. United States v. Marin-Hipolito, 434 Fed. Appx. 346 (5th Cir. 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.