CA9: Parole search of defendant’s belongings in a U-Haul truck was valid

A parole search of defendant’s belongings in a U-Haul truck was subject to the parolee’s control at the time where he was following the truck in a car and all his possessions were in it. The officer had probable cause to believe defendant was still “in control” of the truck, even though he wasn’t driving it. United States v. Smith, 424 Fed. Appx. 686 (9th Cir. 2011) (unpublished).

The “facts available to the officer” clearly established that the consenter had apparent authority to consent to a search of the property. The officer knew that the consenter owned the house. United States v. Ammons, 419 Fed. Appx. 550, 2011 FED App. 0190N (6th Cir. 2011) (unpublished).*

Reasonable suspicion is subject to the collective knowledge doctrine. United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1072-73 & n.3 (4th Cir. 1980). United States v. Tataw, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33120 (E.D. Va. March 28, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.