D.Utah: Officers had reasonable belief defendant was home under Payton

Officers had a reasonable belief that defendant was on the premises for Payton purposes. They didn’t have to have actually seen defendant go in; they had information from reliable CIs that defendant was inside. United States v. Chisholm, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78673 (D. Utah July 19, 2011).*

Defendant was found to have consented on the totality of circumstances. While some factors favor him, the defendant was clearly in custody and guns were drawn. There had been a shooting, however, and defendant was not the suspect so the guns were not pointed at him. Therefore, on the totality, it was still voluntary. United States v. Franco-Lombera, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79181 (D. Idaho July 20, 2011).*

The traffic stop here produced reasonable suspicion, and the delay for the drug dog was reasonable. United States v. Randle, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79259 (D. Minn. June 22, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.