D.Neb.: “Request” for identification is really a demand, and driver is detained while it’s in the officer’s possession

During a stop, a “request” for identification is really a demand, and the officer’s keeping the ID while running it is a seizure of the person. Nevertheless, on the totality of circumstances, the officers had reasonable suspicion to detain the defendant. United States v. Zuniga-Valencia, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73538 (D. Neb. June 3, 2011).*

The affidavit for the search warrant for defendant’s property showed nexus, which is a part of the probable cause analysis. In addition, the affidavit was not so bare bones that the good faith exception should not apply. United States v. Beetz, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73557 (S.D. Ohio July 8, 2011).*

Plaintiff’s cell phone was confiscated at school for using it to make a call. The principal told the student he looked through the pictures on the phone while it was in his possession. Defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings denied. N.N. v. Tunkhannock Area Sch. Dist., 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73637 (M.D. Pa. July 8, 2011),* commented on at Are Student Cell Phone Records Discoverable? on Law.com.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.