S.D.N.Y.: Ptf prisoner pled enough to survive motion to dismiss because of an unnecessary and potentially abusive strip search

Prison search case: “Plaintiff alleges that his clothes were ripped off during the assault, he was left naked on the floor with his boxers barely on, and the C.E.R.T. Defendants searched him ‘without any [l]egitimate penological purpose for the strip search ….’ … These allegations, accompanied by the physical abuse and racial slurs Plaintiff allegedly endured during the C.E.R.T. Raid, are sufficient at this stage to plead that the search was not reasonably related to any legitimate penological interest. … Accordingly, Plaintiff has stated a plausible claim for unreasonable search against the C.E.R.T. Defendants in violation of the Fourth Amendment.” Rodriguez v. Burnett, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62405 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2024).*

Defendant, fleeing from police, stashed his backpack in bushes. That was abandonment, even if he hoped to recover it after release from jail. United States v. Starr, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62112 (W.D. Okla. Apr. 4, 2024).*

The question is whether the package was delivered before the warrant was served. “Mr. Calligan hasn’t [shown deficient performance] here. Conclusory assertions that the officers’ testimony about being aware a package was to be delivered to the home means they must have believed they were executing an anticipatory warrant isn’t enough. Nor would it change the calculus of probable cause. [¶] Trial counsel’s performance regarding the motion to suppress was reasonable.” Calligan v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 62089 (N.D. Ind. Apr. 3, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, Anticipatory warrant, Prison and jail searches, Strip search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.