OH7: Jury view during trial of what public could see did not violate Fourth Amendment

A jury view of property during a trial did not violate the Fourth Amendment. It was judicially authorized, and it saw what the public could see. Monus v. Day, 2011 Ohio 3170, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 2675 (7th Dist. June 13, 2011).

Defendant was not in custody during the execution of the search warrant on his property, and his statements made during the execution of the warrant were admissible. State v. Mangual, 129 Conn. App. 638, 21 A.3d 510 (2011).*

In an administrative prosecution for violating the Smoke-Free Workplace Act, the Health Department’s investigator entered a public area and then a private area observing smoking. The offense was observed in plain view in the public area, so whether the Burger test applies to this administrative search doesn’t have to be decided. Trish’s Café & Catering v. Ohio Dep’t of Health, 2011 Ohio 3304, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 2763 (10th Dist. June 30, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.