OH8: Criminal trespass does not support SI; legally parked car couldn’t be towed for inventory

Defendant’s arrest was for criminal trespass, so a search incident was invalid under Gant. Defendant’s car was legally parked, so impounding the car and inventorying it was unreasonable. A general claim the good faith exception should apply was also rejected. State v. Dent, 2011 Ohio 1235, 2011 Ohio App. LEXIS 1069 (8th Dist. March 17, 2011)*:

[*P16] In the instant case, Lasker testified that he arrested Dent for criminal trespass and inventoried the Pontiac prior to the tow. However, the Pontiac was legally parked at the time of Dent’s arrest and would have been legally parked until 3:00 a.m. “‘This court has held that police may not seize a defendant’s car and conduct an inventory search following a defendant’s arrest where it was legally parked and no public concern existed which required the removal of the car from its legally parked place.’” State v. Clay, Cuyahoga App. No. 91942, 2009 Ohio 2725, ¶26, quoting State v. Ross (May 20, 1993), Cuyahoga App. No. 62215. See, also, State v. Thomas, Cuyahoga App. No. 91891, 2009 Ohio 3461. Furthermore, Dent was secured in the back of the police cruiser and no longer posed a risk to officer safety when Lasker searched the Pontiac, and there is no evidence in the record that Lasker reasonably believed that the vehicle contained evidence of criminal trespass (entering or remaining on the land of another).

[*P17] Based on these circumstances, we find the search of the vehicle was not permitted under Gant. Thus, the trial court properly granted Dent’s motion to suppress.

[*P18] In the alternative, the State argues that even if the inventory search was improper, the search is saved by the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule. We disagree. …

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.