N.D.Ga.: Defendant’s possession at Customs and prior drug arrest justified strip search

At ATL customs, defendant was sent for a secondary search, and his luggage was x-rayed and searched, and officers found meth in a picture frame. Defendant had a prior arrest for drugs, and he was strip searched and it was reasonable on this record. United States v. Laureano-Castellon, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22861 (N.D. Ga. March 7, 2011), R&R 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141849 (N.D.Ga. December 23, 2010):

CBP Chief Pugh also testified that in his experience working for CBP, when narcotics were found in luggage, it was not unusual to find drugs on the body of the person who possessed the luggage in which the narcotics had been found. Therefore, Magistrate Judge Hagy did not clearly err in concluding that the CBP officers had the requisite reasonable suspicion and particularized evidence to justify a limited strip search of that part of Defendant’s body that could not adequately be searched by a pat down; the partial strip search of Defendant did not violate his Fourth Amendment rights.

Defendant’s post-verdict judgment of acquittal for possession of marijuana was denied because there was evidence from which a jury could have convicted, including him sitting in the police car caught on the audio of video recording saying “So, what happened to the weed? So, what happened to the weed?” United States v. Williamson, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22770 (E.D. N.C. March 4, 2011).*

By the time a drug dog was brought out to sniff defendant’s car, the officer developed reasonable suspicion from her extreme nervousness and shaking hands and inability to answer elementary questions about her travels. United States v. Fajardo-Guevara, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22070 (M.D. La. March 4, 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.