CA4: Consent to search house for CP seven hours after illegal entry into curtilage purged taint

Entry into defendant’s backyard by the consent of the landlord was ineffective because a landlord cannot consent to a search of the renter’s property, including the curtilage. Here, however, we also have a consent to search inside the house for child pornography seven hours later which purged the taint of the illegal search of the backyard. United States v. Howe, 414 Fed. Appx. 579 (4th Cir. 2011) (unpublished):

First, a considerable period of time — more than seven hours — elapsed between Healy’s entry onto the curtilage and the seizure of evidence related to child pornography. There was also a significant period of time between Healy’s entry and his request for consent to search. Further, Howe’s voluntary consent to the search of his home was an intervening act of free will. See [Brown v. Illinois,] at 549 & n.10 (holding, albeit in dicta, that consent to further police interaction is sufficient to “sever the connection between an unlawful act and the acquisition of additional evidence”). Finally, Healy’s warrantless entrance onto the curtilage of Howe’s property, while unlawful, was neither flagrant nor offensive. Id. at 550. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of the motion to suppress, although on modified grounds.

Officers responding to a noise complaint at defendant’s trailer ended up inside. They knew that defendant was a convicted felon, so seeing a gun in the premises made it “immediately apparent” that the gun was evidence of a crime for plain view purposes. United States v. Burch, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141795 (S.D. Ga. July 6, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.