D.Nev.: A traffic stop does not have to occur immediately to be reasonable

Officer’s delay in making a traffic stop after the occurrence did not make it unreasonable. There is no bright line rule for that. When it was determined that nobody in the car had a valid DL, it was impounded and an inventory occurred. Apparently significantly, the inventory went to conclusion before the officer spoke a word to the defendant about the fake IDs and gun in the vehicle. United States v. Schultz, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95439 (D. Nev. May 18, 2010), adopted 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95426 (D. Nev. September 13, 2010).

Defendant failed in a Franks challenge to show a knowing or reckless falsity. At best, he showed that the statement was negligent. And, removing the statement from the affidavit, there still was probable cause. United States v. Purifoy, 396 Fed. Appx. 202 (6th Cir. 2010).*

Considering the four factor Dunn curtilage test, the garage fairly separate from defendant’s house was not part of the curtilage. There was a 7′ fence on one side, but a four foot wall on another, and officers could easily see in from off the property. It was not close enough to the house to qualify as curtilage. Police entered after a controlled buy went down. United States v. Ortiz, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95614 (M.D. Pa. September 14, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.