Boston Globe: REP test has become outmoded

A Boston Globe editorial from September 2d, which I just saw today: Supreme Court, Congress need new rules for GPS searches:

THE FOURTH Amendment protects Americans against “unreasonable searches and seizures.” But that protection, the Supreme Court has held consistently for more than 40 years, applies only where there is “a legitimate expectation of privacy.” This means, for example, that the police do not need a warrant to follow a suspect as he drives through town, since a person’s public movements are visible to anyone who chooses to look.

But that test is fast becoming outmoded in an age when advancing technology makes possible a degree of relentless 24/7 surveillance that would have been the stuff of science fiction four decades ago. The Supreme Court should take the first opportunity to reassess its test in light of improved electronic surveillance devices, and Congress should step in to provide guidelines of its own.

The founding fathers are rolling in their graves.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.