Flint MI proposes drug testing public housing tenants

Flint eyes drug tests for public housing; Effort aimed at curbing crime, but ACLU says plan unconstitutional, by Kim Kozlowski in the Detroit News:

Flint’s public housing authority, in an effort to fight crime in the projects, is considering a requirement for all current and prospective residents to take a drug test to keep their federally subsidized apartments.

Flint Housing Commission Executive Rodney Slaughter said he wants a drug-testing program modeled after the city of Indianapolis, where public housing residents are required to take annual drug tests. If a resident tests positive, they would have 30 days to test negative or seek help.

“We’re trying to change the mindset,” Slaughter said. “There is a reasonable amount of negative events that take place … drug dealing, gambling, dice throwing. People should have the right to live in a drug-free, clean community.”

Unconstitutional? Well, duh!

Remember this post from June about the Georgia lawmaker that wanted to drug test those getting unemployment benefits? FoxNews thought it was a jolly good idea, taking away the privacy rights of anybody other than their viewers.

These utterly senseless public [dis]servants need to be drug tested because their stupidity about fundamental privacy law is stunning. Could drug use explain it? No. They must be the product of a failing school system in their states where they either slept through or cut class the day the Fourth Amendment was talked about.

I understood more about the Fourth Amendment in 8th Grade (1961-62; a class debate, Watertown NY public school) than these clowns today, which is perhaps why I’m doing what I’m doing.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.