D.Idaho: Knights probation search rule applies to misdemeanor probation

Defendant on misdemeanor probation is subject to a probation search just as a felony probationer. “The [Knights] Court made no distinction between a felony and misdemeanor probationer.” United States v. Izatt, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73028 (D. Idaho July 20, 2010).

Use of a Customs summons to get Internet subscriber information in a child pornography case violated no privacy interest. United States v. Cray, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73351 (S.D. Ga. May 25, 2010)*:

“Every federal court to address [whether identifying information such as the defendant’s name, address, etc., is protected by the Fourth Amendment] has held that subscriber information provided to an internet provider is not protected by the Fourth Amendment’s privacy expectation.” United States v. Perrine, 518 F.3d 1196, 1204 (10th Cir. 2008) (citations omitted). In the instant case, the information gained pursuant to the Customs Summonses and used to support a probable cause finding for the search warrant was Cray’s subscriber information, residence address, and bank records. Thus, Cray has no protected interest in the subscriber information he provided to AT&T.

Defendant’s stop for trafficking drugs because of movement between Kentucky and Ohio after surveillance was with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Chandler, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73199 (E.D. Ky. July 20, 2010), R&R, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73457 (E.D. Ky. July 2, 2010).*

While the question was really close, the court finds that the continued stop of the defendant was with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Johnson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73468 (E.D. Tenn. May 19, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.