CO: Failure to show CI’s basis of knowledge makes SW fail, and no GFE

The officer here completely failed to show the CI’s basis of knowledge and the officer did not corroborate it, so there was no showing of probable cause. Even though the existence of a warrant creates a presumption of good faith under state law, the defendant rebutted it by showing the officer’s lack of knowledge. People v. Hoffman, 2010 Colo. App. LEXIS 493 (April 15, 2010).*

Officers had no qualified immunity for their warrantless entry and subsequent search. Walker v. King County, 376 Fed. Appx. 704 (9th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

Stop near the scene of a bank robbery and waiting for backup to arrive was reasonable. United States v. Dixon, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37631 (D. Minn. March 8, 2010).*

The search of defendant’s car was justified by consent, so Gant does not apply to this § 2255. Young v. United States, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38034 (E.D. Tenn. April 16, 2010).*

The officer was in the house talking to another man, and the defendant walked out, with the officer following telling him to come back. Defendant stopped and said he did nothing wrong, and other officers arrived and “flanked” him, and he attempted to flee. He was not seized until he attempted to flee, and it was with reasonable suspicion. United States v. Smith, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37927 (E.D. Tenn. March 11, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.