OH4: Hearsay admissible in suppression hearing

Hearsay was admissible at the suppression hearing, and the evidence is sufficient to support the findings. Even without it, there was enough. State v. Ulmer, 2010 Ohio 695, 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 579 (4th Dist. February 12, 2010).*

Defendant was stopping and going in a high crime area, and when the officer approached he was reaching for something on the floor and the officer directed him to show his hands, and he was slow to do so. This was reasonable suspicion. State v. Scrivens, 2010 Ohio 712, 2010 Ohio App. LEXIS 590 (11th Dist. February 25, 2010).*

The frisk of defendant’s vehicle was justified by the officer’s reasonable suspicion that he was a dangerous person. Quint v. Deerfield, 365 Fed. Appx. 697 (7th Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

There were symptoms of driving under the influence, so the use of a PBT was reasonable. State v. Scheffert, 279 Neb. 479, 2010 Neb. LEXIS 28 (February 26, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.